Boumediene v. Bush 2008

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2022-05-03 11:40:52 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2865 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 檸檬椰子汁 ] 在 2022-05-03 11:41:35 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: Draft opinion is not a final decision, the votes may...akc2022-05-03 11:21:40

Breyer denied cert (not taking the case) initially becaue he couldn't get 5 votes.  A little later, after he persuaded Kennedy, he told the Boumediene attorney to applyl for cert again.  

It took four votes for SC to take the case, and five vote (in most cases) to rule.  Breyer and three liberals would have voted to take the case, but Breyer decided to vote against taking the case intially for the above reason, therefore at first the case only got 3 votes in the court thus failed.

But From wikipedia

In February 2007, a three-judge panel of the Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit considered Lakhdar Boumediene's habeas corpus submission, and in a split decision, upheld the Congress's authority to quash the outstanding habeas corpus submissions.[7] In April 2007, the Court declined to review the Circuit Court's decision.

Within a few months, it reversed this decision; on June 29, 2007, it granted a writ of certiorari to Boumediene and his co-defendants.[8][9]

 

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”