回應

來源: 單身老貓 2022-04-08 00:15:32 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (6080 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 單身老貓 ] 在 2022-04-08 00:19:25 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

 Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 325).

(a) For the purpose of constituting an adverse possession by a person claiming title, not founded upon a written instrument, judgment, or decree, land is deemed to have been possessed and occupied in the following cases only:

(1) Where it has been protected by a substantial enclosure.

(2) Where it has been usually cultivated or improved.

(b) In no case shall adverse possession be considered established under the provision of any section of this code, unless it shall be shown that the land has been occupied and claimed for the period of five years continuously, and the party or persons, their predecessors and grantors, have timely paid all state, county, or municipal taxes that have been levied and assessed upon the land for the period of five years during which the land has been occupied and claimed. Payment of those taxes by the party or persons, their predecessors and grantors shall be established by certified records of the county tax collector.

 

同時,請參考下列資料

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/who-can-claim-property-based-adverse-possession-california.html

 

Imagine that Brian and Suzy live next to one another in a suburb outside of Pasadena. Without a wall between their properties, Brian begins to put lawn furniture on what is technically Suzy's land. Eventually, Brian builds an entire patio there. Suzy never says anything. The years pass—five years, in fact. Brian pays property taxes to cover that piece of land. Under California's adverse possession framework, Brian could potentially be successful in establishing an ownership claim to that portion of Suzy's property. Note that he won't be able to take over all of Suzy's lawn—only the portion upon which he constructed the patio and which he actively used for those years. California courts would be reluctant to suddenly eject Brian and his patio after so much time has passed.

所有跟帖: 

我的理解是需要使用並付稅五年,對嗎? -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2022 postreply 06:47:21

而且是未經允許的(hostile)。你租地也是使用並賦稅,那是經過允許的。 -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2022 postreply 08:47:53

回應 -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (254 bytes) () 04/08/2022 postreply 19:34:08

首先不是我圈的,其次我也沒有那個原本地主的聯絡方式。第三我房客的小孩整天在那裏踢球遛狗,不讓他們在那裏玩了他們不會滿意的 -天青水藍- 給 天青水藍 發送悄悄話 天青水藍 的博客首頁 (353 bytes) () 04/09/2022 postreply 00:24:49

你是現任房主,所有占用他人產業的問題是你的責任,當然必須由您來解決。 -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (2394 bytes) () 04/09/2022 postreply 06:42:57

送你一個影片,希望對你有所幫助 -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (212 bytes) () 04/09/2022 postreply 07:31:21

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”