根據原帖， 那個機構和律師之間已經沒有關係了。況且推薦這個詞也沒有任何約束的含義。

legal service thru employer based referral is usually for getting quality service with some discounts, that is it, nothing else.

it is always a dilemma between quality service and cost related, you get what you pay for.

所有跟帖： 

• 是因為律師換了公司所以以前的推薦自動作廢嗎？就是不清楚這點。 -aques- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/11/2019 postreply 14:14:16

• of course. anyway the referral doesnot mean much. -hello2002- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/11/2019 postreply 14:17:11

• 謝謝指點，本來以為他們之間會有律師私人簽的合同。您能告訴我怎麽會導致1/3嗎？如果這錢他賺的太容易。 -aques- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/11/2019 postreply 14:26:37

• for worst , the lawyer will follow the default terms printed on -hello2002- ♀ (272 bytes) () 07/11/2019 postreply 15:42:08

• 是啊，你提醒我了。如果當時他真沒讓我簽的話，他不可能幫我幹活的，對吧，雖然活不多。 -aques- ♀ (98 bytes) () 07/11/2019 postreply 16:32:35