我倒是沒有經驗。但是，對方說她倒車出的車禍，在路上倒車是很少出現的情況。

她不承認，對方還進了醫院，保險公司肯定站在她這方麵認真處理這個事，打官司到法院，對方沒理由沒證據，我覺得贏不了。

我在網上找到這個，http://www.all-about-car-accidents.com/resources/auto-accident/after-a-car-accident/how-to-win-a-he-says-she-says-auto-accident-

The Drivers’ Credibility

Credibility is believability. If the driver that hit you says that it was your fault, but he/she is not credible, the jury will generally not believe him/her. Some factors that affect a jury’s thinking about credibility are:

• whether the person’s testimony at trial is consistent with his/her past testimony or statements (especially statements to the police officer about how the accident happened)
• whether the person has a criminal record
• whether the person’s version of events seemed plausible
• whether the person appeared to be lying
• the person’s demeanor and attitude

所有跟帖： 

• 還有2點：1）當時有沒有警察來，有沒有警察報告。有的話，也有用。 -N.- ♀ (141 bytes) () 08/10/2017 postreply 14:11:10

• 我沒有說對方會贏，沒有證據誰都不會贏，最終是誰都贏不了各自的保險賠各自的。 -像龜的兔子- ♀ (137 bytes) () 08/10/2017 postreply 14:53:22

• 事實上這種追尾的案子證據一般不會有太大的分歧，不大會各賠各的。 車身別的部位會有扯皮 -hello2002- ♀ (140 bytes) () 08/10/2017 postreply 16:34:51

• 這個其實不難判斷。如果是2車都停住那裏，樓主倒車的話 -白兔媽- ♀ (278 bytes) () 08/10/2017 postreply 16:33:02

• 我的車停著， 前麵有一兩車也在等紅燈。她是過會兒撞上來的。 -gb692- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/11/2017 postreply 18:07:51