ur answer is not comprehensive

來源: 拉拉拉拉拉 2003-12-01 23:54:00 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (357 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 拉拉拉拉拉 ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:28 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
there are still some other important grounds. you just count common law negligence and warranty clause. what about statutory/strict liability? different states regulate differently.
for negligence, personal injury is not required. property damage is enough if caused by the negligent conduct.

but u r right, she/he need to talk to a legal counsel



所有跟帖: 

回複:ur answer is not comprehensive -wal-mart- 給 wal-mart 發送悄悄話 (259 bytes) () 12/02/2003 postreply 05:59:00

that's what I said. -narrow-min- 給 narrow-min 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/02/2003 postreply 09:32:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”