insurance should pay

On their service contract, inspector usually disclaims any defects behind walls where they could not see. Even if he is responsible, he is only responsible for the inspection fees you paid ($200-300).  He is not responsible for the actual damages.

The seller might claim he doesn't know about the leak.  Past leaks are not evidence that present leak exists and known. 

所有跟帖： 

• 謝謝。幾乎1/3的地板下方都是經年積累的黴，即使如此，seller也沒責任嗎？ -阿拉蕾ya- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:23:20

• How do you prove that he knew about it? -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (1071 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:28:18

• 還是檸檬厲害。這個概念多少人都扯不清。這樣一句話就說的很清楚。 -PineRock- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 13:41:19

• 嗯，看來我是問對人了。可是，如果我的insurance company來看後說，這 -阿拉蕾ya- ♀ (205 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:02:43

• Your insurance company should cover it, but -PineRock- ♂ (223 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:32:15

• so basically seller does not have to disclose anything -sayyousayme- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/13/2015 postreply 14:34:48

• 隻要您能夠確定對方找不到證據 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (398 bytes) () 09/14/2015 postreply 09:43:20