"cost YOU $2500" is only your assumption, not true

it was very clear she meant the lens itself. She said "the lens costs $2500", she did not say "it costs YOU $2500", that is big difference.

The reason I paid $1500 was because I have to chose to do Laser, that is another $2000. Her original words are something like this: the lens alone costs $2500, but if you chose to do Laser, you will get a discount price for $1500 for the Lens.

再重申一遍，不是收費高低的問題，而是覺得他們事先沒有給我任何關於lens的信息，並且告訴我不實的lens價格。這是讓我不高興的地方.

所有跟帖： 

• 服裝店衣服的進價是$10， 他們賣給顧客是$100。 你的case，人家租著房子，雇著醫生，怎麽可能原價給你呢？ -goingplace- ♀ (54 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 06:41:25

• 你的扣法也不對： -我愛拉氏- ♀ (125 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 06:45:04

• 超市的東西進貨非常便宜，但他們要把所有的費用全加到食品，包括賣不完的損耗，這樣想你就想通了。 -goingplace- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 06:47:58

• 有意思…… -soccerfan- ♀ (364 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 07:03:25

• 你要這麽想，如果醫術拿到鏡片的價格是$2500, 他$1500賣給你，就損失了$1000, -N.- ♀ (124 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 07:42:29

• that's not my assumption -慧惠- ♀ (349 bytes) () 07/24/2015 postreply 11:21:06