NO

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parol_evidence_rule#Overview

The rule applies to parol evidence, as well as other extrinsic evidence (such as written correspondence that does not form a separate contract) regarding a contract. If a contract is in writing and final to at least one term (integrated), parol or extrinsic evidence will generally be excluded.[2] However, there are a number of exceptions to this general rule, including for partially integrated contracts, agreements with separate consideration, to resolve ambiguities, or to establish contract defenses.

To take an example, Carl agrees in writing to sell Betty a car for $1,000, but later, Betty argues that Carl earlier told her that she would only need to pay Carl $800. The parol evidence rule would generally prevent Betty from testifying to this alleged conversation because the testimony ($800) would directly contradict the written contract's terms ($1,000).

所有跟帖： 

• 謝謝，次序是這樣的：lease在先，後來我問怎麽才能transfer lease給想接手的人， -米小- ♀ (273 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:26:22

• 該7月1號轉，我想堅持不去掉我的名字就不轉。 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:36:38

• 我寧願辦公室空著都不要給別人做擔保人 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:55:00

• 這不是做生意，這是賭氣，生意場的大忌。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:58:16

• 我有風險考慮，與其給別人擔保，不如自己花錢花心思找人做 -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:15:18

• 那就隻好等lease到期再轉手了 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (124 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:23:44

• 多謝了！ -米小- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:28:17

• 你的最佳結果就是加第三者的名字，不要亂搞買賣公司，你的名字是除不掉的 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (189 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 10:56:38

• 謝謝，我明白了。那我選擇不讓出辦公室，賣公司的事property manager有責任,是她讓我們買賣公司的。 -米小- ♀ (75 bytes) () 06/18/2015 postreply 11:08:48