如果趕鴨子上架,可以說

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2015-06-06 08:36:47 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (555 bytes)
This case is not just about the plaintiff seeking damages. It is more about educating the defendant that he should have been more careful in supervising children riding bicycles. When crossing the street, a reasonable person should have told the child to walk the bike instead of riding it out of a sloped driveway. The accident could have been much worse, the child could have been maimed or killed because of the defendant's negligent supervision. I hope this court send a message to the defendant by awarding the damage of $$$ to the plaintiff.

所有跟帖: 

good argument! 但收了錢再去告,喝喝。。。 -nj_guy- 給 nj_guy 發送悄悄話 nj_guy 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/06/2015 postreply 08:48:40

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”