No, Andrew is guilty by self-admission, Owen had better lawyers.

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2015-04-01 16:53:33 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (481 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 檸檬椰子汁 ] 在 2015-04-01 16:54:42 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
Andrew admitted that he said offensive things, and Owen said Andrew did. The evidence against Andrew is 2-0. Guilty.

Owen never admitted he said anything, but Andrew accused, so the evidence against Owen is 1-1, cannot convict unless it is > 51%.

Very important to keep your mouth shut. Owen had better lawyers, if parents were lawyers for their children.

Who are better parents is remaining to be seen.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”