不能“如果不看白線“， 因為“能隱約從樹縫間看到一條好象是白線”

不要說”如果不看白線“。對方提供的證據是假設”能隱約從樹縫間看到一條好象是白線“。你需要挑戰那個假設。

In the state of （your state), the standard for conviction of a crime requires the prosecution to show beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the violation cited.

However, the requirement of beyond reasonable doubt is not satisfied because the evidence against on the defendant is based on a mistaken presumption that the solid white line is visible in the video.

I am going to show that that the solid white line is not visible in the video because the following reasons:

First,...

Second...

Because the solid white line is not visible in the video, the prosecution have not established beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's car passed the solid white line after the light changed to red.

所有跟帖： 

• 謝謝大哥回複，可能我沒說清楚。 -GHDGHD- ♀ (473 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:52:39

• 建議你再讀一遍 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (426 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:58:56

• 大哥的意思是我可以一口咬定錄像中看不到白線，所以無法確定是否闖了紅燈？ -GHDGHD- ♀ (105 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 09:58:36

• beyond reasonable doubt -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (244 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 10:01:09

• 謝謝了。 -GHDGHD- ♀ (12 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 10:48:32

• 漲知識了, 檸檬能不能介紹部漲正經法律知識(有關律師)的美劇, 這樣學習又輕鬆又有效, 嗬嗬 -EMSWhite- ♂ (94 bytes) () 01/30/2015 postreply 14:31:35