The law is what you argue it to be

Another example, if the law prohibits "more than three unrelated person LIVING together", is a temporary guest "LIVING" together? A friend can visit for a few weeks, it is not "LIVING" together. In fact, many Chinese parents visit their US children for six months, but nobody says "my parents are living with me", they say "my parents are visiting for six months."

所有跟帖： 

• next question: where do they live? -慧惠- ♀ (476 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 17:45:06

• 謝高手，：） -水中撈月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 17:50:20

• I was right, at least according to City of Norman, OK -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (712 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 17:52:22

• 如果規則這樣定義，那沒什麽可爭的，我反駁的，是你對related推斷 -慧惠- ♀ (75 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 18:04:12

• Water/Moon is right, according to Fort Collins, CO -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (266 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 17:55:39

• 看來隻有當地的法規解釋才是可靠的，謝謝你的Google. -水中撈月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 18:07:31

• 是的，房東也許有理，但很不友善。 -wolfkiller8- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 18:18:14

• 以你的才氣，教教樓主如何反擊這不友善的房東。 -水中撈月- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 18:33:26

• 才氣沒有，膽氣有點，如果老貓不在，俺就大膽提議：大道至簡，房東不善，罪不致死，刀不出鞘打屁屁十下！ -wolfkiller8- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 19:01:05

• 如果老貓向俺亮爪子，連這點膽氣都要泄光了。 -wolfkiller8- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 19:04:58

• 謝謝你能讀懂我，我剛才擔心又犯‘原則錯誤’。 -慧惠- ♀ (210 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 18:56:39

• ni這次的邏輯，照狼才子話說，是一針見血，直達源頭。 -水中撈月- ♂ (42 bytes) () 01/23/2015 postreply 19:42:07