If settle then no court

來源: lexm5 於 2014-10-23 18:04:13 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (778 bytes)
本帖於 2014-10-23 18:10:10 時間, 由普通用戶 lexm5 編輯
回答: still have to go to court even if we settle? 由 panyca 於 2014-10-23 18:00:19

I am not familiar with your department of civil right (canada?), so I cannot say who is right.

But I would at least stay on fighting a little longer. I would not settle at first round of settlement discussion. Is your LD a person good at negotiation? Sometimes negotiations is a lot of bluffing.

You said it yourself, "又說我們可以counter-offer", this is merely a negotiation tactic. 

Who signs 4 year lease?  even if their monthly damage of $100,  people usually sign 1 year lease, their damage is at most $1200.  As you said, it is not certain they even qualify with your review process, I'd counter offer $500 and never settle above $1000. 

所有跟帖： 

• We are in Michigan -panyca- ♀ 給 panyca 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/23/2014 postreply 18:24:49

• Do not settle -lexm5- ♂ 給 lexm5 發送悄悄話 (474 bytes) () 10/23/2014 postreply 21:56:25

• 感覺dept. of Civil Rights的調查員催我們settle -panyca- ♀ 給 panyca 發送悄悄話 (373 bytes) () 10/24/2014 postreply 20:11:34

• 他們當然希望你們settle,這樣他們的工作就少了。你老公嫌麻煩想付錢，不嫌麻煩去上課？ -N.- ♀ 給 N. 發送悄悄話 N. 的博客首頁 (480 bytes) () 10/24/2014 postreply 22:53:13

• 這回政府動作太快了，我懷疑 -panyca- ♀ 給 panyca 發送悄悄話 (362 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 06:12:04

• 你跟你老公說，這事你來處理。這件事情你沒道理會輸。真的是寧可把錢給律師，也不給無賴。 -N.- ♀ 給 N. 發送悄悄話 N. 的博客首頁 (119 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 09:17:25

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！