Assuming capital gain of a nonresident alien are not subject to

來源: lexm5 2014-02-20 12:51:35 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (756 bytes)
回答: 回複:Not as income, but as capital gaintuzitababa2014-02-20 12:42:10
Since I am not a tax expert, all my reasoning are based on the assumption of following rules

capital gain of a foreign property of a nonresident alien are not subject to US tax.  Capital gain of a foreign property of a US resident alien and a US citizen are subject to US tax. 

Unless you find laws contradict above assumption, my argument is valid.  From 1999 to 2009 his status is a nonresident alien in US.  Therefore I don't see why he should pay capital gains from 1996 to 2009.

Again, check with a tax expert.  All the above are just some ideas I throw around. 

Lastly, thanks for your compliment, even though it is qualified. :)

所有跟帖: 

回複:Assuming capital gain of a nonresident alien are not subject -tuzitababa- 給 tuzitababa 發送悄悄話 (219 bytes) () 02/20/2014 postreply 12:54:38

1040-NR brings back memories -lexm5- 給 lexm5 發送悄悄話 (198 bytes) () 02/20/2014 postreply 13:08:12

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”