Assuming capital gain of a nonresident alien are not subject to

來源: lexm5 於 2014-02-20 12:51:35 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (756 bytes)
回答: 回複：Not as income, but as capital gain 由 tuzitababa 於 2014-02-20 12:42:10

Since I am not a tax expert, all my reasoning are based on the assumption of following rules

capital gain of a foreign property of a nonresident alien are not subject to US tax.  Capital gain of a foreign property of a US resident alien and a US citizen are subject to US tax. 

Unless you find laws contradict above assumption, my argument is valid.  From 1999 to 2009 his status is a nonresident alien in US.  Therefore I don't see why he should pay capital gains from 1996 to 2009.

Again, check with a tax expert.  All the above are just some ideas I throw around. 

Lastly, thanks for your compliment, even though it is qualified. :)

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：Assuming capital gain of a nonresident alien are not subject -tuzitababa- ♂ 給 tuzitababa 發送悄悄話 (219 bytes) () 02/20/2014 postreply 12:54:38

• 1040-NR brings back memories -lexm5- ♀ 給 lexm5 發送悄悄話 (198 bytes) () 02/20/2014 postreply 13:08:12

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！