這是加州的家庭法？太荒謬了。
如果你的太太紅杏出牆搞到懷孕，THE HUSBAND would be still the father for the child.
Unless the father file the petition to the court within two years, and only
if the court find the nature father would be more benefit to the child, the
court rarely made that decision to separate the family to give the child to
the nature father. Unless the legal hu*****and file divorce with two year
statue limitation and file the petition to the court regard the paternity
issue and the judge approval it, otherwise the hu*****and is still responsible
to the child. Because the children's court looking into what is the best
interest to the child not to the adult's benefit.
How could in this situation the lega "father" can give the child the best interest?
