大家幫忙看看這個合同合理嗎？

大家幫忙看看這個合同合理嗎？

要把狗狗送去寄宿幾周，對方要求簽免責合同。該公司聲稱有保險，fully bonded。但合同裏有以下幾條：

If the pet(s) become ill while under the care of ***, and medical care is needed in the best judgment of ***, Client authorizes *** to transport the pet(s) to Client s veterinarian (or one who is available). Client authorizes *** to approve any emergency treatment recommended by said veterinarian when the cost of treatment is within the limits authorized in a Veterinarian Release Form. Client authorizes *** to take Clients pet(s) to an Emergency Clinic For Animals when the Clients veterinarian is not immediately available. Client further agrees to promptly reimburse *** for any expenses incurred for any medical treatment or emergency care.

Client releases *** from all liability related to transportation, treatment, or expenses, resulting from any emergency or special needs as determined by ***.

 *** is the dog boarding and training company.

看以上條例，那不管發生什麽事情，狗狗的醫療費都是主人承擔，對方沒有任何責任。那麽他們的保險是保什麽呢？如果是因為他們的疏忽，狗狗有什麽問題，簽了這個合同是不是意味著他們可以免責了？

不太懂，希望有經驗的人指點一下。謝謝！

所有跟帖： 

• Quite standard for kennels. -AidanMom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/03/2012 postreply 18:55:20

• 謝謝，因為我們常去的一家從沒讓我們簽過這個。看來要買好保險 -沁園- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/03/2012 postreply 19:45:12