回複:真心請教, 買ipad帶來的法律問題.

回答: 真心請教, 買ipad帶來的法律問題.calmleo2012-06-21 13:36:42

The detective is correct. Assuming AAA, who sold you the pad, is also a bona fide purchaser himself, then the law governs between you and him is solely contract law, i.e., Uniform Commercial Code, Section 2, which is adopted in most jurisdictions except in Louisiana. One of the implied conditions in a sales of good contract is that the seller must have good title. Since the pad was stolen, nobody in the chain has good title to it, including AAA. Under the circumstances, AAA breached the contract between you and him by not fulfilling the above implied condition and you are entitled to damage, i.e., your purchase price. I suppose you could take the owner to a small claim court to recover the money paid.

Now, there are several problems. One, if the owner is in a different state, then you may have to go to his state to sue since courts in your state may not be able to assert personal jurisdiction over him. Second, I suppose when you bought the pad from CL there was no written contract. If the pad is over $500, then that is the most you can recover. Third, you may be able to purchase a replacement and hold AAA liable as well. Finally, you may be able to recover some of the incidental expenses such as postage, etc, as well.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:真心請教, 買ipad帶來的法律問題. -calmleo- 給 calmleo 發送悄悄話 calmleo 的博客首頁 (1317 bytes) () 06/21/2012 postreply 16:51:15

answers -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (233 bytes) () 06/21/2012 postreply 17:34:36

回複:answers -calmleo- 給 calmleo 發送悄悄話 calmleo 的博客首頁 (33 bytes) () 06/22/2012 postreply 04:28:56

For your first and third question, see this link -Henxiaoloulou- 給 Henxiaoloulou 發送悄悄話 (166 bytes) () 06/21/2012 postreply 18:16:21

回複:For your first and third question, see this link -calmleo- 給 calmleo 發送悄悄話 calmleo 的博客首頁 (58 bytes) () 06/22/2012 postreply 04:33:14

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!