Based on your logic: because the Chinese lady wants to divorce, her婚姻 is 涉嫌詐騙 and she needs to give up her green card and go back to China to avoid going to jail. Divorce = 婚姻涉嫌詐騙? Don't you think your logic is ridiculous? "任何人的I think" is much better than your logic even if it is "無關緊要".
回複:任何人的I think無關緊要,移民局認為這個婚姻是真的還是假的唯一重要
所有跟帖:
• 這是一個關於誹謗的普法機會 -henxiaoloulou- ♀ (802 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 10:42:31
• 回複:這是一個關於誹謗的普法機 -863211- ♂ (414 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 11:35:30
• 繼續普法:被告已經間接認罪,承認誹謗 -Henxiaoloulou- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 11:41:27
• 回複:繼續普法:被告已經間接認罪,承認誹謗 -863211- ♂ (586 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 12:02:52
• 繼續普法:被告的辯解已經開始語無倫次。 -henxiaoloulou- ♀ (49 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 12:11:40
• 你也不要買弄風情,假當大法官嚇唬人。 -863211- ♂ (341 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 12:46:13
• ENOUGH,再鬧兩個都給"彈射出境". (要鬧到別處去鬧,這個壇子不容你們兩個在這裡撒野) -單身老貓- ♂ (106 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 13:16:53
• 回複:ENOUGH,再鬧�É個都給"彈射出境". (要鬧到別Ì幦ヴ[,這個壇子不容&# -863211- ♂ (111 bytes) () 06/09/2012 postreply 13:19:53