Based on your logic: because the Chinese lady wants to divorce, her婚姻 is 涉嫌詐騙 and she needs to give up her green card and go back to China to avoid going to jail. Divorce = 婚姻涉嫌詐騙? Don't you think your logic is ridiculous? "任何人的I think" is much better than your logic even if it is "無關緊要".
回複:任何人的I think無關緊要,移民局認為這個婚姻是真的還是假的唯一重要
所有跟帖:
•
這是一個關於誹謗的普法機會
-henxiaoloulou-
♀
(802 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
10:42:31
•
回複:這是一個關於誹謗的普法機
-863211-
♂
(414 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
11:35:30
•
繼續普法:被告已經間接認罪,承認誹謗
-Henxiaoloulou-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
11:41:27
•
回複:繼續普法:被告已經間接認罪,承認誹謗
-863211-
♂
(586 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
12:02:52
•
繼續普法:被告的辯解已經開始語無倫次。
-henxiaoloulou-
♀
(49 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
12:11:40
•
你也不要買弄風情,假當大法官嚇唬人。
-863211-
♂
(341 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
12:46:13
•
ENOUGH,再鬧兩個都給"彈射出境". (要鬧到別處去鬧,這個壇子不容你們兩個在這裡撒野)
-單身老貓-
♂
(106 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
13:16:53
•
回複:ENOUGH,再鬧�É個都給"彈射出境". (要鬧到別Ì幦ヴ[,這個壇子不容&#
-863211-
♂
(111 bytes)
()
06/09/2012 postreply
13:19:53