回複:我也不太明白,律師說是一個constitutional right,

來源: apt 2012-02-15 12:10:47 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1058 bytes)

Normally, a court must notify you, in writing, that the nature of your proceeding, your right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, your right to subpoena witnesses at your own expenses, your right to hire a counsel at your own expenses. This is mandatory in a criminal proceeding. When you go to a court, the bailif should give a print out to state the above and ask you whether you understand and ask you to sign the paper as well. This is not typically read out to you by a judge, but toally depends on your court.

If the court has not done so, then yes you have a ground for appeal.

Right to lawyer, right to remain silent, are part of Miranda rights, which have nothing to do in a court proceeding. Miranda rights are read out to an accused by the poilce who made the arrest. If the accused is not properly mirandized,everything the accused said to the police and as a result, physical evidence found, will be excluded in the criminal proceeding against the accused, unless they fall into exceptions.  

所有跟帖: 

Thanks for explaining this to me. -名花有主- 給 名花有主 發送悄悄話 名花有主 的博客首頁 (250 bytes) () 02/15/2012 postreply 12:54:03

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”