回複:回複:這個問題您應該問房東,你的房東或許不î娨餑frac14;?DIY.

來源: 單身老貓 2011-07-05 21:18:02 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1205 bytes)

老貓不知道您當地是否有此規定,然而一般正規官方的資料的建議如下 (並沒有提及您所說的部份)

4. Other damage to walls

Generally, minor marks or nicks in walls are the landlord's responsibility as normal wear and tear (for example, worn paint caused by a sofa against the wall). Therefore, the tenant should not be charged for such marks or nicks. However, a large number of holes in the walls or ceiling that require filling with plaster, or that otherwise require patching and repainting, could justify withholding the cost of repainting from the tenant's security deposit. In this situation, deducting for painting would be more likely to be proper if the rental unit had been painted recently, and less likely to be proper if the rental unit needed repainting anyway. Generally, large marks or paint gouges are the tenant's responsibility

資料來源

http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/sec-deposit.shtml

至於您是否應該負責,就由您個人與房東依據上述的原則來協商了...

 

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:這個問題您應該問房東,你的房東或許不î娨餑?times;?frac14;?DIY. -hjh73- 給 hjh73 發送悄悄話 hjh73 的博客首頁 (77 bytes) () 07/12/2011 postreply 10:04:35

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”