回複:根據我的理解,美國法律不能強迫某人賠禮道歉

來源: wal-mart 2004-09-19 09:53:47 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (857 bytes)
Thanks for your insightful comment. As a matter of fact, the possible implication of First Amendment did not come to my mind when I was trying to address the issue of the possiblity that a US court may award a relief of compelling an appology from the perspective of equity. I agree that mandatory injuction is hardly enforceable and only occassionally issued, but a court order to compell a defendant to appologize in an open court or on the media, such as newspaper, is not impossible. A judge may be reluctant but it does not mean that he/she is incapable of doing so. Actually, in a malicious libel case, if the plaintiff can establish that monetary damage or other type of relief, such as a retraction than an appology in public would not remedy the injury, a court of equity may compel the defendant to appologize under the court's close monitoring.

所有跟帖: 

apology/retraction distinguish -JanKoller- 給 JanKoller 發送悄悄話 (1213 bytes) () 09/19/2004 postreply 15:08:49

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”