回複:回複:回複:孩子在鄰居家玩受傷,鄰居該付醫療費用嗎?

來源: Apt 2011-04-15 16:17:14 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (630 bytes)

Every law school teaches a famous tort case in first year. Lubitz v. Wells. Plaintiff, a 9 years old, went to play with defendant's son, 11 years old, on defendant's yard. The 11 years old swung a golf club which the defendant left there, struck the plaintiff in the head, causing injury. The jury found for the defendant and the club was not intrisically dangerous that would constitute a negligence by the defendant. You may argue a shovel is different than a club but I think your chance of hold your neighbor liable may be really slim. The questions were to make sure your son was not a trespasser and things like that.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:回複:回複:孩子在鄰居家玩受傷,鄰居該付醫療費用嗎? -forever_searching- 給 forever_searching 發送悄悄話 (147 bytes) () 04/15/2011 postreply 17:34:11

小孩之間玩出小意外,大人心態要正。你可以問問 -傻等啦- 給 傻等啦 發送悄悄話 (66 bytes) () 04/16/2011 postreply 12:08:35

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”