美國專利不完全是“誰先申請,誰拿專利”

美國專利不完全是“誰先申請,誰拿專利”,有時候是“誰先搞出發明,誰拿專利”。

非專業人士

專業人士

 A person shall be entitled to a patent unless—
(g) (1) during the course of an interference conducted under section 135 or section 291, another inventor involved therein establishes, to the extent permitted in section 104, that before such person’s invention thereof the invention was made by such other inventor and not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed, or (2) before such person’s invention thereof, the invention was made in this country by another inventor who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. In determining priority of invention under this subsection, there shall be considered not only the respective dates of conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who was first to conceive and last to reduce to practice, from a time prior to conception by the other.

(未完待續)

: 等我有空詳細談, 我要下班了。: 請參 35 USC 102(g):

請閱讀更多我的博客文章>>>
  • 美國專利不完全是“誰先申請,誰拿專利”
  • “愛恨專利”是什麽意思?
  • 所有跟帖: 

    請您不要重復發帖佔用版麵,謝謝您的合作. -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2010 postreply 11:12:05

    回複:Õ埬?灰?貜桶l帖佔用版?aelig;,謝謝您的合作. -愛恨專利- 給 愛恨專利 發送悄悄話 愛恨專利 的博客首頁 (112 bytes) () 09/08/2010 postreply 11:38:24

    請您先登陸,再發跟帖!