我們以加州的法律來說明, under Civil Code Section 1950.5(b),(e)),tenant is not responsible for damages resulting from normal wear and tear. 然而住客有責任需要
“clean as it was when the tenant moved in” (Civil Code Section 1950.5(b)(3).),所以您仍然需要負擔清潔的費用.
老貓上麵所說的是“useful life” rule"(依據加州相關的規範)
normal wear and tear to carpets, drapes and other furnishings cannot be charged against a tenant’s security deposit normal wear and tear includes simple wearing down of carpet and drapes because of normal use or aging, and includes moderate dirt or spotting. in contrast, large rips or indelible stains justify a deduction from the tenant’s security deposit for repairing the carpet or drapes, or replacing them if that is reasonably necessary.
one common method of calculating the deduction for replacement prorates the total cost of replacement so that the tenant pays only for the remaining useful life of the item that the tenant has damaged or destroyed. For example, suppose a tenant has damaged beyond repair an eight-year-old carpet that had a life expectancy of ten years, and that a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost $1,000. the landlord could properly charge only $200 for the two years’ worth of life (use) that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet
(所以老貓需要更正的是,如果以十年來計算,如果對方更新整個地毯,您需要負擔的是 40%的責任,不是老貓如上所說的 60%...
數學不太好... :-)
至於對於牆的維護,依據加州的規定,如果您住滿兩年以上,您需要負擔全部清潔或是油漆的費用.
“clean as it was when the tenant moved in” (Civil Code Section 1950.5(b)(3).),所以您仍然需要負擔清潔的費用.
老貓上麵所說的是“useful life” rule"(依據加州相關的規範)
normal wear and tear to carpets, drapes and other furnishings cannot be charged against a tenant’s security deposit normal wear and tear includes simple wearing down of carpet and drapes because of normal use or aging, and includes moderate dirt or spotting. in contrast, large rips or indelible stains justify a deduction from the tenant’s security deposit for repairing the carpet or drapes, or replacing them if that is reasonably necessary.
one common method of calculating the deduction for replacement prorates the total cost of replacement so that the tenant pays only for the remaining useful life of the item that the tenant has damaged or destroyed. For example, suppose a tenant has damaged beyond repair an eight-year-old carpet that had a life expectancy of ten years, and that a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost $1,000. the landlord could properly charge only $200 for the two years’ worth of life (use) that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet
(所以老貓需要更正的是,如果以十年來計算,如果對方更新整個地毯,您需要負擔的是 40%的責任,不是老貓如上所說的 60%...
數學不太好... :-)
至於對於牆的維護,依據加州的規定,如果您住滿兩年以上,您需要負擔全部清潔或是油漆的費用.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
