Yes. You have your point.

來源: CyberCat 2009-11-19 15:06:03 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (479 bytes)
回答: Accompany her to a local torts lawyer.CyberCat2009-11-19 12:17:27
Out of question, in her case the nanny is an employee. By law she would have to pay FICA for her. And if the Nanny is not authorized to work, she may have to pay penalty. In addition, if she lives in New York you would have to buy worker's compensation insurance for her to cover exactly this type of injury. Also, the Nanny weekly pay is below $495, she would have to pay her OT, which can go back as far as her starting date on top of a hefty fine. Well, she's doomed:-)

所有跟帖: 

Thanks ! 希望樓主也了解... :-) -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/19/2009 postreply 15:15:33

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”