為作文發愁的同學可以試試這個

滿分作文生成器

http://beautyyu.top/full-mark-composition-generator/index.html

 

以下是一個sample：

 

生活在仙人掌上

現代計算機科學以艾倫·J·佩利的“有兩種方法可以編寫無錯誤的程序；隻有第三種方法有效。”為嚆矢。濫觴於哲學與數學的期望正失去它們的借鑒意義。但麵對看似無垠的未來天空，我想循林納斯·托瓦茲“低水平程序員總在考慮代碼，高水平程序員總在考慮數據結構及其之間的關係。”好過過早地振翮。

我們懷揣熱忱的靈魂天然被賦予對超越性的追求，不屑於古舊坐標的約束，鍾情於在別處的芬芳。但當這種期望流於對構造主義不假思索的批判，乃至走向直覺與邏輯主義時，便值得警惕了。與秩序的落差、錯位向來不能為越矩的行為張本。而縱然我們已有翔實的藍圖，仍不能自持已在浪潮之巔立下了自己的沉錨。

“懦夫才用磁帶備份：真男人把重要的東西傳到ftp，然後世界會幫他備份。”林納斯·托瓦茲之言可謂切中了肯綮。人的有限性是不可祓除的，而我們欲上青雲也無時無刻不在因風借力。數學與哲學暫且被我們把握為一個薄脊的符號客體，一定程度上是因為我們尚缺乏體驗與閱曆去支撐自己的認知。而這種偏見的傲慢更遠在知性的傲慢之上。

在孜孜矻矻以求計算機科學意義的道路上，對自己的期望本就是在與數學與哲學對接中塑型的動態過程。而我們的底料便是對不同最近公共祖先、不同網絡流的覺感與體認。哈羅德·埃布爾森為西恩·帕倫特送去最大流最小割定理，又維係輪廓動態規劃。他的計算機科學觀念是厚實的，也是實踐的。倘若我們在對過往借菲爾·卡爾頓之言“祓魅”後，又對不斷膨脹的自我進行“賦魅”，那麽在丟失外界預期的同時，未嚐也不是丟了自我。

毫無疑問，從哲學與數學角度一覘的自我有偏狹過時的成分。但我們所應摒棄的不是對此的批判，而是其批判的廉價，其對批判投誠中的反智傾向。在林納斯·托瓦茲的觀念中，如果在成為獅子與孩子之前，略去了像駱駝一樣背負前人遺產的過程，那其“永遠重複”洵不能成立。

藍圖上的落差終歸隻是理念上的區分，在實踐場域的分野也未必明晰。譬如當我們追尋啟發式迭代加深時，在途中涉足P=NP猜想，這究竟是伴隨著期望的泯滅還是期望的達成？在我們塑造計算機科學的同時，計算機科學也在澆鑄我們。既不可否認原生的離散性與無後效性，又承認自己的圖景有輕狂的失真，不妨讓體驗走在言語之前。用不被禁錮的頭腦去體味大衛·韋勒的大海與風帆，並效林納斯·托瓦茲，對無法言說之事保持沉默。

用在仙人掌上的生活方式體現個體的超越性，保持婞直卻又不拘泥於所謂“遺世獨立”的單向度形象。這便是菲爾·卡爾頓為我們提供的理想期望範式。生活在仙人掌上——始終熱愛大地——升上天空。

 

然後再股狗翻譯一下：

Live on cactus

Modern computer science uses Alan J. Paley's "There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third method is effective." The expectations that originated in philosophy and mathematics are losing their reference. But facing the seemingly boundless sky of the future, I would like to follow Linus Torvalds, "low-level programmers are always thinking about code, and high-level programmers are always thinking about data structures and the relationships between them." It is too early. Earth Zhenhui.

Our passionate soul is naturally endowed with the pursuit of transcendence, disdainful of the constraints of the old coordinates, and love the fragrance elsewhere. But when this kind of expectation flows into a critique of constructivism without thinking, or even to intuition and logic, it is worthy of vigilance. The gaps and dislocations with order have never been a violation of the law. And even though we have a detailed blueprint, we still can't hold ourselves to have set our own anchor on the top of the wave.

"The coward uses tape to backup: a real man uploads important things to ftp, and the world will back it up for him." Linus Torvalds' words can be said to have hit Ken Qi. The finitude of human beings is inextricable, and we want to go to the sky all the time because of the wind. Mathematics and philosophy are temporarily grasped by us as a thin-spine symbolic object, partly because we still lack experience and experience to support our own cognition. And the arrogance of this prejudice is farther than the arrogance of intellectual.

On the road of diligently seeking the meaning of computer science, the expectation of oneself is a dynamic process of shaping in the docking with mathematics and philosophy. And our basic material is the perception and realization of different recent public ancestors and different network flows. Harold Ebleson sent Sean Parent theorem of maximum flow and minimum cut and maintained dynamic contour planning. His concept of computer science is solid and practical. If we "enchant" the ever-expanding self after borrowing the words of Phil Carlton in the past, then we may not lose ourselves while losing outside expectations.

There is no doubt that the philosophical and mathematical self has elements of narrow and outdated. But what we should abandon is not the criticism of this, but the cheapness of its criticism, and its anti-intellectual tendency in surrender to criticism. In Linus Torvalds' concept, if the process of carrying the legacy of the predecessors like a camel is omitted before becoming a lion and a child, then the "forever repetition" cannot be established.

The gap on the blueprint is ultimately just a distinction between ideas, and the distinction in the field of practice may not be clear. For example, when we pursue the deepening of heuristic iterations and get involved in the P=NP conjecture on the way, is this accompanied by the disappearance of expectations or the fulfillment of expectations? While we are shaping computer science, computer science is also shaping us. It is undeniable that the original discreteness and no aftereffect, but also admits the frivolous distortion of one's own picture, it is better to let the experience go before the words. Use an unfettered mind to appreciate the sea and sails of David Weller, and follow the example of Linus Torvalds to remain silent about the indescribable.

The lifestyle used on the cactus reflects the transcendence of the individual, keeping straight but not sticking to the unidirectional image of the so-called "independence of the world." This is the ideal expectation paradigm provided by Phil Carlton. Living on cacti-always loving the earth-and rising to the sky.
 

一篇辣雞文就出爐啦