I am just very curious to know

why this wasn't found by the internal technical check by the journal Nature?

Normally, for my research area, a submitted manuscript is first checked by the journal through a so-called technical check to ensure there is no any obvious plagiarism issue. They use some software like turnitin with a massive database to do the comparison.

In my University, even the unergraduate's assignment report is first screened by turnitin prior to being checked by us. What a laugh that Riken even does not have such a function or hire the staff who are in such a low scientist moral. 

All ends up with a big mess by this tricky lady.  

所有跟帖： 

• 理研的論文都是個人投稿的，並不通過研究所。 -靜齋居士- ♂ (134 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:20:22

• 她不會捏著一條帶有s生理 -王翠花- ♀ (70 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:44:33

• 厲害！ -靜齋居士- ♂ (59 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:53:00

• 你沒被日本女學生勾引過？ -王翠花- ♀ (12 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:02:36

• 犀利呀！經你一點撥，好象真有她把他們都收服了的感覺。 -喜愛溫泉- ♀ (12 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:21:26

• 大凡這種4，50歲的大叔，年輕時光顧學習沒好好戀愛過。於是她就把他們都收服了！ -王翠花- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:43:17

• 4，50歲的大媽，不一樣也要找小11歲的，嗬嗬。 -靜齋居士- ♂ (36 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 02:10:54

• 這個有些落後，現在都是捏著一疊豔照 -人約黃昏後- ♀ (34 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 20:08:57

• 知識分子一枝花 -飯盛男- ♂ (23 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 20:15:45