回複：回複：NIW 補充材料!

1.LABEL 很清楚.PETITION LETTER 後麵每一個EXHIBIT前麵都有一個PARTITION,每個PARTITION上麵都有一個編號.

Answer:

They did not say the exibits were not clearly labeled. They meant your materials were not well organized to support what you claimed in your application. Or simply it means you might have used unrelated materials as evidence because you do not have other strong evidence.


2.引用一個CASE隻是說明材料按這個CASE來組織

Each case is unique because of different backgrounds.
They do not care how you organize materials in your case in a particular way. But they do care how you use those materials to support what you claimed in your application.


3.引用BUSH 的講話等隻是借官方之口來說明我研究領域的重要性.


It is fine to cite the words from Bush (But do not cite whole speech of Bush!!) That is not enough. You need to demonstrate how excellent you are (superior to your peers?) and what impacts of your research work.


4.難道隻有第一作者文章被引用能作為RECONITION的證據第二第三作者的文章被引用就不能列出來嗎?

You should focus on the citations of your first authorship papers. If you do need the citatations from coauthorship publications, you need to demonstrate specifically what and how much you contributed to that paper (such as the letter from first author to prove what you said). You can mention them but do not focus on them. In a word, you need to demonstrate you are superior to your peers. If all citations from your coauthorship publications, how can you prove you are superior to your peers if you just have coauthorship publications.


5.學術機構的獎項不能拿出來作為證明材料嗎?
Yes, you can but not always. It depends on the purpose.


Anyway, said is easier than done. You may need to get a copy of successful petition letter from your friends, and then use it to discuss with your lawyer and knowledge him.

Take your own responsibility to your case even if you hire a lawyer. Your case is almost everything for you but not everything for your lawyer since you are just one of his clients. Good luck to your case.