In my original application, I did not elaborate about my patents and papers except a long list. My reason for omitting the details was that my application might become too long and INS officers might not have the time to go through all. In the RFE letter, INS asked to address the issues that were outlined in NYSDT case (see www.twmlaw.com). In my reply, I highlighted my research achievements that are of national interest and scope, and that underline the intrinsic merit of my petition. This time, I included the patent records and reprints of my key publications. I also told them that I'd be happy to supply additional materials if required. Apparently, it worked.
回複:回複:I-140 NIW Approved after FRE
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:I-140 NIW Approved after FRE -Manythanks- ♂ (110 bytes) () 04/21/2005 postreply 15:26:10
• 回複:回複:回複:回複:I-140 NIW Approved after FRE -arabbitter- ♂ (114 bytes) () 04/21/2005 postreply 15:34:58