我很快就被RFE了

RD:1/18/2005
ND:4/8/2005
/***************************************************************************************************
In Summary, the evidence provided does not pesuasively demonstrate that the beneficiary's individual contributions as a researcher were or are beyond the capabilities of any number of trained professionals in his field. In addition, you have not shown that the beneficiary's research findings have impacted the field to a degree where his past record justifies projections of future benefit to the nation to a degree where the granting of a national interest waiver would be warranted.
****************************************************************************************************/

Today my lawyer told me this news and asked me provide with more letters.
Any experienced guy can give some comments. For example, whether this is considered a bad RFE?

Thanks a lot !

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：我很快就被RFE了 -maormaor- ♀ (68 bytes) () 04/14/2005 postreply 22:21:21

• 回複：回複：我很快就被RFE了 -感覺不太妙- ♀ (79 bytes) () 04/15/2005 postreply 06:44:40

• 回複：我很快就被RFE了 -zl- ♀ (169 bytes) () 04/15/2005 postreply 10:13:42

• 回複：回複：我很快就被RFE了 -感覺不太妙- ♀ (76 bytes) () 04/15/2005 postreply 12:41:53

• 回複：回複：回複：我很快就被RFE了 -csdcsd- ♂ (141 bytes) () 04/18/2005 postreply 11:24:36