樓下兩位同學找到的MEMO我2009年就已經知道, 我的律師們也都知道. 但是你們讀這個memo的時候不覺得內容很shaky嗎? 我公司的律師最後還是給我做了H1-B. 隻多花了1200的premier processing fee 因為我之前有短暫的H1-B. 我的感覺就是用H1-B入境和用TN入境有天壤之別, 最近這兩次去拿TN的時候平均每次被問各種問題20-30分鍾, 各種不講理的assumption. 比如我TN在美國這麽多年怎麽證明我不是想留下來。多倫多機場簽TN的OV一次比一次難纏，相比之下底特律橋還好一些。我回來和HR同事說起TN的驚險，他們馬上決定給我辦綠卡和H1-B。那個MEMO裏麵的case by case基本就是說看VO的心情。如果等140上去後，TN被拒（不是因為140本身），那麽麻煩應該很大，所以既然可以申請H1-B為什麽要冒險用TN呢？勞工紙和140 比H1-B難10倍，勞工紙和140 都給辦了，還嫌H1-B煩？
-TN is fine. If you don't travel internationally too much after I-140 is filed, you may not experience the trouble you mentioned with TN status, but eventually you are still allowed to enter US.
As for H-1, some employers (e.g. small company) may not want to sponsor it even if they sponsor you I-140. The reason is that there is cost of about total $5000 (lawyer fee and H-1 fee) for sponsoring each H-1b, and also the employer have to pay the H-1 holder at the prevail wage level, but no specific requirement to pay TN holder (can pay the TN holder with lower salary.
-TN is fine. If you don't travel internationally too much after I-140 is filed, you may not experience the trouble you mentioned with TN status, but eventually you are still allowed to enter US.
As for H-1, some employers (e.g. small company) may not want to sponsor it even if they sponsor you I-140. The reason is that there is cost of about total $5000 (lawyer fee and H-1 fee) for sponsoring each H-1b, and also the employer have to pay the H-1 holder at the prevail wage level, but no specific requirement to pay TN holder (can pay the TN holder with lower salary.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
