回複：再問8老師：關於"nunc pro tunc"?

來源: 863211 於 2013-06-27 08:37:29 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (737 bytes)
回答: 再問8老師：關於"nunc pro tunc"? 由 floatinghere 於 2013-06-27 08:05:21

在網上搜到以前有同學H4過期10個月，最後說是據皮老師建議采用了"nunc pro tunc" 進行解決，不知您對這個"nunc pro tunc"有了解嗎？
-Only a few case of can work using "nuc pro tunc" and if it does not work, your spouse will illegally stay for > 180 days. So, you do not want to be risky, do you? Of course if she was unlawfully present for > 180 days, she would use "nunc pro tunc" because she had no choice in this case (she will be subjected to 3- or 10-year bar if she leaves US in this case).

能否適用於我，剛查了下機票，回國不易啊！
-It does not matter to go to China a couple of weeks later.

所有跟帖： 

• 感謝8老師的耐心指導，基本上知道該怎麽做了。 -floatinghere- ♂ 給 floatinghere 發送悄悄話 (43 bytes) () 06/27/2013 postreply 12:58:46

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！