Novel Research Isn’t ...

來源: NIW_2004 2004-11-02 11:37:31 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (931 bytes)
Novel Research Isn’t Necessarily Influential Research


Like publication records without citations, documentation of novel research discoveries and patents without evidence of their impact on others was generally ineffective. For example, the unsuccessful appeal by the research programmer in biometrics was hurt by the lack of evidence that the new ecological model estimation method he had developed had impacted the field. This, despite the fact that each expert witness praised the petitioner’s new method.



Similarly, the AAO found, in the appeal by the Ph.D. candidate in agricultural engineering, that patent applications were not compelling evidence of substantial past achievement because there was no indication that the patents had influenced the field. Instead, the AAO noted that the filing of, and even approval of, patent applications is anything but rare in the United States.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”