1. petition letter主打美國的研究，會提到中國的中文文章的引用，但研究方向完全不同，困惑的是到底要不要找引用中文文章的推薦人專門寫一封推薦信？害怕申請打向兩個不同的方向。
-Your former advisor in China is enough.
2. 有沒有啥策略能把兩個不同方向在綠卡申請的package裏麵連起來？
-Not need to link it and your achievements in China may be used to prove your abilities and the achievements in US may be used to prove your abilities and national interests.
3. 隻是選擇PHD導師和5號是中國人的assistant professor提及中文文章的研究成果夠不夠？（雖然中文文章引用多，但不再專門用一個推薦人寫推薦信）
-Fine.
4. 俺的律師明說建議盡量不用PHD導師和論文committee做推薦人寫推薦信，大家怎麽看？
-Your advisor and one committee have to provide the recommendations because they are the best people who know you very well and understand your job imporatnce and achievements very well. The lawyer does not make sense.
5. 能否請你們幫助選擇對我的情況最有利的組合？
-Five to seven recommendation letters are good enough, and nine are too much. Each letter had better be not more than two pages. Also, two independent references are good enough.
