rfe內容慘不忍睹!
個人情況如下:
美國soso學校PhD (Computational chemistry&Biophysics),現一所較top medical
school作postdoc。文章一作5篇(4篇英文,一偏JACS IF8),2作1篇。他引30+。
Invited book chapter 1 篇。審稿1篇(現增為5篇,全英文, IF2-5)。
決定找律師!先谘詢了一個朋友極力推薦的律師,比較悲觀,剛開始建議重辦,但我不
希望浪費1年排期,才答應response。另外谘詢了一個律師,比較樂觀,認為是最近流
行的generic rfe,我case不是很弱,比較自信。
總而言之,感覺辛苦了半年準備的材料,VO全盤否定,非常痛苦。在這裏想聽聽大家管
我case難易以及律師選擇的看法。
如下是rfe大部內容,鋪天蓋地...
You must establish that the national interest would be served if you were
required to obtain a labor certificate for the proposed employment. ... The
evidence of record does not establish (i) how you have influenced the field
as a whole apart from your current and previous employers; (ii) how you
contributed more than others in the field; and (iii) how you stand apart
from the other in the field as been able to benefit the national interest.
You must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest would be
adversely affected if a labor cert were required. You must demonstrate that
it would be contrary to the national interest to potentially deprive your
employer of your services by making the position available to US workers.
You must establish that you have a past record of specific prior achievement
with some degree of influence on the field as a whole. Your previous
influence on the field as a whole must justify projections of future benefit
to the national interest. You must establish your ability to serve the
national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of
others in the field.
You must establish that your skills or background are unique and innovative
and serve the national interest. If you possess any special skills,
knowledge or abilities that could not be articulated on an application for
labor certification, you must submit evidence demonstrate these special
skills, knowledge or abilities.
...Even though you have published articles in the field and had other
researchers to acknowledge the importance of your work in the field, the
totality of the evidence of record does not establish that your skills,
knowledge or abilities could not be articulated on an application for labor
certification.
NIW-DIY被悲慘的RFE了
所有跟帖:
•
回複:NIW-DIY被悲慘的RFE了
-sept.-
♀
(291 bytes)
()
09/24/2011 postreply
18:30:59