She will be OOS upon denial of her I-485, and theoretically in removal proceedings for unlawful presence. You were suggesting her then to "prove there exists extreme hardship", to prevent her from being removed.
USCIS does not care about extreme hardship she, as being is removal, suffers. Instead, what USCIS considers are extreme hardship, caused by her removal, brought to her family members, who are either USC or LPR.
The point is stated in the first paragraph of either links you provided.
回複:Wish you have read above links and understand - 回複:請問皮匠,86321
所有跟帖:
•
回複:回複:Wish you have read above links and understand - 回複:請問皮匠,86
-husk-
♂
(201 bytes)
()
08/26/2010 postreply
09:04:21
•
Please take it as your homework - 回複:Wish you have read above li
-pjiang-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/26/2010 postreply
09:16:58
•
回複:Please take it as your homework - 回複:Wish you have read above
-husk-
♂
(390 bytes)
()
08/26/2010 postreply
09:46:30
•
回複:回複:Please take it as your homework - 回複:Wish you have read ab
-pjiang-
♀
(1011 bytes)
()
08/26/2010 postreply
10:47:19
•
回複:回複:回複:Please take it as your homework - 回複:Wish you have read
-husk-
♂
(332 bytes)
()
08/26/2010 postreply
13:28:23