回複：應該是沒有任何Conviction，當時什麽都沒說，就讓他先上課

If "我老公admitted動手推了我一下" is only recorded in the police report, you should be fine. The police report cannot be used as evidence of conviction.

If he never admits it in court and never pleaded guilty in court, later the case is dismisssed, then you do not need to worry about it for the interview.

BTW, even though there is some general speculation about the what crime is moral turpitude, the final decision is only made by some professionals after comparing the exact elements in the statues to be accepted by USCIS. There is no easy way to say if "simple assault" is CIMT or not, but DV usually is CIMT.

所有跟帖： 

• 明白了！非常感謝！ -換個馬甲說傷心事- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/27/2010 postreply 14:16:36

• 回複：回複：應該是沒有任何Conviction，當時什麽都沒說，就讓他先上課 -bbyx- ♂ (230 bytes) () 07/27/2010 postreply 23:03:49

• 回複：回複：回複：應該是沒有任何Conviction，當時什麽都沒說，就讓他先上課 -husk- ♂ (291 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 07:02:09

• 謝謝指點！我寫了個總結貼在上麵了，麻煩你看看有沒有問題 -換個馬甲說傷心事- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 07:59:12

• 先寫了一些個人理解剛貼出來，麵試順利的話會上來再寫，不順利就不一定有機會了 -換個馬甲說傷心事- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 08:00:44