NIW REF by #0100 @ TSC,並求助

PD:08-13-2009

case比較弱，國內PhD,文章少（13），引用少(~20).
推薦信 7，5 independent.
推薦人的背景都很強，基本都是美國名校的，還有一個UK劍橋的。

-----------------------------------------------------------
REF by #0100 @TSC,08-31-2009; CUD:10-1-2009

09-05-2009才收到mail。here is the request:
Pls clarify the number of citations the beneficiary recieved regarding their
work,since the Service was unable to determine the number of citations the
beneficiary received.
-how many overall citations has the beneficiary received?
-Of these citations how many citations were for articles the beneficiary
first-authored?
-How many were independent ciations, and how many were cited by the
beneficiary?
----------------------------
我的問題是：
律師讓我再準備2-3封推薦信。但是這麽短的時間內真的很難搞到推薦信，人品都用光
了，:P

但是看這樣的REF,大家認為推薦信是必須的嗎？
因為遞交的時候citation這一項準備得比較差，個人認為準備一個更清楚的、新的
citation list就行了。

謝謝建議！

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：NIW REF by #0100 @ TSC,並求助 -doshexh- ♀ (160 bytes) () 09/09/2009 postreply 10:23:54

• 但是該如何對付推薦信問題？ -dahuaxiyou- ♂ (78 bytes) () 09/09/2009 postreply 10:43:58

• 但是該如何對付推薦信問題？ -dahuaxiyou- ♂ (74 bytes) () 09/09/2009 postreply 10:44:43

• 回複：但是該如何對付推薦信問題？ -doshexh- ♀ (177 bytes) () 09/09/2009 postreply 10:56:24