Yes. This is unfair.

來源: late60's 2009-05-28 10:50:22 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (277 bytes)
100% agree with you. Basically visa number, which is no more than 7% for each country, is distributed per country, not per priority date. Fairly to say number should be per country to keep in line with that, in stead of per priority date when re-distributing the unused number.

所有跟帖: 

我的想法 -late60's- 給 late60's 發送悄悄話 (165 bytes) () 05/28/2009 postreply 11:03:59

回複:Yes. This is unfair. -也來支持- 給 也來支持 發送悄悄話 (27 bytes) () 05/28/2009 postreply 16:20:44

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”