現在是不是都隻給1個半月？沒有時間了，快救救我，歡迎任何指導建議， 跪謝了先， RFE letter 如下：
A petition for an alien of extraordinary ability must be accompanied by evidence that the alien has sustained national or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have been recognize in the field of expertise. Such evident shall include evidence of a one-time achievement or at least three of the following.
(i)Documentation of the alien's receipt of lesser nationally or internationally
The record does not show such evidence.
(ii)Documentation of the alien's membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievement of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields:
The record shows that the petitioner is a member of Sigma Xi. However as the record shows information regarding the membership standards as “noteworthy achievement,” it cannot be considered to be sufficient evidence of extraordinary ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information regarding the requirements necessary to meet for membership and demonstrate that it is evidence of extraordinary ability.
(iii) Published meterail about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought. Such evidence must include the title, date, and author of the materials, and any necessary translation:
The record shows approximately thirty citations made by others of the petitioner's work, but this criterion requires that the evidence of articles be specifically about the petitioner or his work, not aritcles that reference them to support their own. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must also clearly indicate that the work is significant: an unevaluated listing in a subject matter index or footnote, or a reference to the work without evaluation is insufficient, or a mere reference to his work or inclusion of his publications in bibliographies or footnotes, would also be insufficient for this criterion.
(iv) Evidence of the alien's partition, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought:
The record show that the petitioner has participated in the peer review process. While this suggests recognition of the petitioner's knowledge and competence, further evidence is needed to show that the petitioner has extraordinary ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information regarding the criteria for selection as a panelist, reviewer, etc.
(v)Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field:
The record shows that the petitioner has provided several advisory opinion letters. However a successful petition is not solely dependent on support letters. Further documentary evidence showing that the petitioner's original contributions are of major significance is needed.
(vi)Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media:
The record shows that the petitioner has had fifteen articles published and that others have cited them. However as the publication of articles is part of the career path of a research engineer, additional evidence, such as further documentation of published articles that cite them, is needed to show that the beneficiary has national or international acclaim for having extraordinary ability.
A petition for an alien of extraordinary ability must be accompanied by evidence that the alien has sustained national or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have been recognize in the field of expertise. Such evident shall include evidence of a one-time achievement or at least three of the following.
(i)Documentation of the alien's receipt of lesser nationally or internationally
The record does not show such evidence.
(ii)Documentation of the alien's membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievement of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields:
The record shows that the petitioner is a member of Sigma Xi. However as the record shows information regarding the membership standards as “noteworthy achievement,” it cannot be considered to be sufficient evidence of extraordinary ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information regarding the requirements necessary to meet for membership and demonstrate that it is evidence of extraordinary ability.
(iii) Published meterail about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media, relating to the alien's work in the field for which classification is sought. Such evidence must include the title, date, and author of the materials, and any necessary translation:
The record shows approximately thirty citations made by others of the petitioner's work, but this criterion requires that the evidence of articles be specifically about the petitioner or his work, not aritcles that reference them to support their own. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must also clearly indicate that the work is significant: an unevaluated listing in a subject matter index or footnote, or a reference to the work without evaluation is insufficient, or a mere reference to his work or inclusion of his publications in bibliographies or footnotes, would also be insufficient for this criterion.
(iv) Evidence of the alien's partition, either individually or on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought:
The record show that the petitioner has participated in the peer review process. While this suggests recognition of the petitioner's knowledge and competence, further evidence is needed to show that the petitioner has extraordinary ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information regarding the criteria for selection as a panelist, reviewer, etc.
(v)Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field:
The record shows that the petitioner has provided several advisory opinion letters. However a successful petition is not solely dependent on support letters. Further documentary evidence showing that the petitioner's original contributions are of major significance is needed.
(vi)Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media:
The record shows that the petitioner has had fifteen articles published and that others have cited them. However as the publication of articles is part of the career path of a research engineer, additional evidence, such as further documentation of published articles that cite them, is needed to show that the beneficiary has national or international acclaim for having extraordinary ability.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
