Actually I believe here we're discussing about I-134 - 回複:Thanks

來源: pjiang 2009-05-04 07:16:17 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1287 bytes)
Actually I believe here we're discussing about I-134 rather than I-864.

I-864 is for purpose of immigrantion.
I-134 is for non-immigrant visa.
http://blog.wenxuecity.com/blogview.php?date=200709&postID=18438

As mentioned above that "幫親戚申請父母探親" and "在為F1申作擔保".

For I-864, the sponsor should be "居住在美國境內美國公民和永久居", plus "at least 18 years old". For I-134, I don't see such requirement (or I may have overlooked something). Some people in non-immigrant status choose to include I-134, in which themselves are sponsor, for their parent to come as B-2 visitor, although I-134 itself does not help that much if not at all in obtaining the visa.
http://blog.wenxuecity.com/blogview.php?date=200709&postID=10310#B2

Let's back to the question below:
如果因為學校入學辦公室人員的不仔細,擔保人不是居住在美國境內美國公民和永久居民,而且在為F1申作擔保時,F1也被批準了,
1.對green card的申請會有影響嗎?
2.green card背景調查時,會調查這嗎?謝謝
- No, no





所有跟帖: 

Thank u so much! -tim1234- 給 tim1234 發送悄悄話 tim1234 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 07:23:14

回複:Actually I believe here we're discussing about I-134 - 回複:Tha -souledgeii- 給 souledgeii 發送悄悄話 (65 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 17:44:04

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”