NIW RFE 求救,請大家幫忙,非常感謝

來源: alaazz 2009-04-26 06:06:01 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2938 bytes)
因為H1已經用過兩年,很擔心在未來的4年裏處理不完身份問題,懇請大家給一點幫助和建議,謝謝。

我去年10月給NE簃民中心遞交的NIW申請,4月8號他們 寄出了RFE信。當時我做的是GIS和水土保持的博士後,今年一月我轉到TX做TENURE TRACK的教職,還是GIS和水文行業。從博士期間到遞交NIW,做過USFS和NASA的項目,有兩個軟件在行業內有很多人使用,但一共隻有一篇期刊文章(第一作者)和一篇會議文章發表。當時還有兩篇期刊文章被接受,今年年初正式發表(至今還沒有被引用)。

1) NE還是給了我很長時間做RFE(7.1.2009), 請問這是正常情況嗎?
2) 對第一段括號中的話怎麽理解?
3)如果到六月我的文章還是沒有被引用,怎麽辦?並且最後的兩篇是在遞交NIW後正式發表(在NIW申請中有列出),在RFE中提及有用嗎?
4)怎麽應付第四段的RFE?

做博士後時對身份很緊張,所以在文章不強的情況下遞交了NIW。再過幾個月,我可以通過學校遞工作based EB2 或EB1,還有就是我聽說TX移民中心會鬆一點,我如果撤回上一個NIW申請,再向TX移民中心遞一份基於目前情況的NIW,會好一點麽?但這個撤回申請會不會有很大的負麵影響?

Additional evidence is requested to evaluate eligibility for a national interest waiver pursuant to the tests established in Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Please note: the evidence already submitted demonstrates that the proposed research employment has substantial intrinsic merit and would be national in scope).

Please submit copies of published articles by other researchers citing or otherwise recognizing the self-petitioner’s or beneficiary’s research and/or contributions. Please highlight the portion of the paper that references the self-petitioner or beneficiary’s work and highlight his or her name in the bibliography, references or “works cited” section. It is not necessary to submit articles that are self-referencing; i.e. written by the petitioner/beneficiary or his/her collaborators. In the alternative, you may also submit printouts of search results from such websites as SciFinder and Google Scholar, just to name two. Please note that any such printout must contain the title, authors, and publication information for both the cited and citing article. Please cross out self-referencing items.

Please note that you must establish eligibility at the time of filing this petition. Therefore, papers that are “under preparation” or have been accepted but not published as of the date of filing this petition have no bearing on these proceedings.

You must establish you have a past record of specific prior achievement that justifies projections of future benefit to the national interest. You must establish, in some capacity, your ability to serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of your colleagues. You must demonstrate to some degree your influence on your field of employment as a whole.

Please do not resubmit any evidence sent with the original instant petition as the record have been reviewed in its entirety.

所有跟帖: 

回複:NIW RFE 求救,請大家幫忙,非常感謝 -penghuaGC- 給 penghuaGC 發送悄悄話 (1080 bytes) () 04/26/2009 postreply 06:56:57

回複:NIW RFE 求救,請大家幫忙,非常感謝 -fsa2000- 給 fsa2000 發送悄悄話 (391 bytes) () 04/26/2009 postreply 09:55:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”