回複:請教PJIANG及各位明人,已無可能在期限內提供RFE要求

來源: sdfsdfsdff 2009-04-21 06:56:43 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (733 bytes)
4.我們的I-94一直有效,可能失業後公司withdraw 我的H1-B,但在前一家公司的H1-B仍然有效,可是他們不願給出符合移民局要求的雇主證明

These are two different requirements, not the same thing. And to me, both are easy to answer according to your description
First is to prove that you have work authorization, so the two H1 I-797/I-94 (from both companies) will suffice. Or if you have c9 EAD, you are also fine for this requirement.
Second is employment verification letter to prove that the LC same or similar job offer is still good. If you are working for a company that is sponsoring you H1, I don't see why they would refuse to write such simple letter? (unless it's NOT a similar job so they don't want to lie.)

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:請教PJIANG及各位明人,已無可能在期限內提供RFE要求 -Radix- 給 Radix 發送悄悄話 Radix 的博客首頁 (359 bytes) () 04/21/2009 postreply 07:04:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”