需要,不需要,兩種回答都有。另有情報:有朋友實際被要求提交了,但特例?還是一般性?請各路高手指教. 如版主皮匠能給幾句話,不勝感激.
In instruction of I-485, "If your form I-485 is related to an employment-based visa petition (Form I-140), you must submit a letter on the letterhead of the petitioning employer which confirms that the job on which the visa petition is based is still available to you. The letter must also state the salary that will be paid"
My question
I am 100% sure: EB1A I-140 doesn't need any support from employers. (in the whole process of mine, I didn't talk about it with my employer except responding the kind concern)
For I-485,
(1) "the job ...is still available to you". Logically these words are not applicable to EB1A because the word "still". --- I judged, but not confident.
(2) Some friends said: employment letter is necessary. So I hope to see the substantial web-site or something to confirm.
提上來再問: Employment letter is necessary for I-485? (EB1A I-140)
所有跟帖:
•
回複:提上來再問: Employment letter is necessary for I-485? (EB1A I-140)
-penghuaGC-
♂
(522 bytes)
()
04/18/2009 postreply
12:14:55
•
Only this employment letter is enough or still need to provide p
-Diva311-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
04/18/2009 postreply
14:21:37
•
回複:回複:提上來再問: Employment letter is necessary for I-485? (EB1A I-1
-Zixun-
♂
(718 bytes)
()
04/18/2009 postreply
23:30:23
•
回複:回複:回複:提上來再問: Employment letter is necessary for I-485? (EB1A
-penghuaGC-
♂
(7947 bytes)
()
04/19/2009 postreply
04:00:51
•
回複:回複:回複:回複:提上來再問: Employment letter is necessary for I-485? (EB
-Zixun-
♂
(676 bytes)
()
04/19/2009 postreply
11:38:05