回複：有人給老師挑了三個＂錯＂

Hehe, welcome back and I am waiting for your new arguements. But let me make my points clear for you:

"他認為臨時工人 H-1B 的配偶 H-4 在使用 I-485 基礎上的 EAD 之後，其 H-4 非移民身份依舊保持而不進入身份調整狀態 (AOS)."

my point is: because of H/L exception, H-4 status and AOS can co-exist; it is the filing of I-485, NOT USING EAD, that makes the applicants in AOS. clear?

在討論這個問題的同時，老師提到了臨時工人 H-1B 用 AP 入境後其身份為保釋而不再是非移民 H-1b （但移民局仍允許其 H-1B 的轉延）。

my point is: because of H/L exception, H-1B and AOS can co-exist; further, H-1B and parole status can co-exist (please do not mess up AOS and parole); you can maintain your H-1B after using AP. Clear?

"對於本人依據的移民局備忘錄之原文，他沒做回複。"

my response to your misleading statements were based on the memo. It seems you did not read my words carefully.