1) If I had shown you an example which the NIW I-140 was denied simply because of his filing LC, wouldn't you have argued again that "An isolated violative practice cannot and should not be used to interpretate the law."?
2) Do you understand the difference between the tones of "may be" and "will be"? Do you really understand my point there when bringing in NIW/EB-2 PERM and EB-2 PERM/EB-3 PERM?
As I said to you earlier, "When you discuss with me, it is important that you understand my point."