A little additional information(Peasewang did good job!)

1. You have ted evidence which indicates you have received an RO1 grant from the NIH, along with evidence of several other awards. Please describe the significance of these awards, their scope, the requirements necessary to compete for the award, and the criteria utilized to select the recipients.

--- Nothing helpful on grant. But no harm to provide further evidence. Try to search NIH garnt review criteria and your priority score for this, to establish you are the top 10%.
***Provide detailed documents if possible. It is good if your documents are thick.

2. You have ted evidence of memberships in several organizations. However, the evidence ted fails to establish that outstanding achievements are required for membership in any of these organizations. Please provide evidence and documentation that establishes you membership/role in the organization requires outstanding achievements.

-- try to find membership criteria to complete it.
**Download the online information about the membership and tell the percentage of members in the field. Translate if it is not in English.

3. Published material about the alien: Mere reference to your work or inclusion of your publication is bibliographies or footnotes is insufficient. Such evidence must include the title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation.

-- Give the full list AND print the first page of the citation. More evidence is better. Not be lazy!
**Also print the reference part and HIGHLIGHT your name.

4. You indicate you have been chosen as a reviewer of other’s work. Please documentary evidence to demonstrate how you were selected for this role and its significance.

--Ask the editor or your professor to state that the criteria is based on the top expertise and blah blah in this field. Or you may search from the journal website for reviewer criteria.


5. You ted evidence to establish that you have authored/co-authored articles in the field of endeavor, evidence which indicates that your works have been cited by other researcher. Please any additional documentary evidence you wish to have considered to establish this criterion, including any additional citations not contained in the initial evidence.

-- try to search citation as more as possible, including scientific citation, web- or other media citation, especially including your name.
**You can also sum Impact Factor of all the articles citing your work. You can get it online. Print all of them and HIGHLIGHT your name.

6. The record contains evidence indicating that you have presented your search findings at various conferences and symposia. Researchers are expected to publish articles discussing their research and present their findings in different forums, which provide for the dissemination of the work. Please explain, and provide documentary evidence, to demonstrate how presenting your work at these conferences has granted you national of international acclaim.

-- try to state that you present frequently and was INVITATEd by others...
** I think you can give a percentage of the oral/poster presentation divided by the attendees of the meetings. Provide an abstract of the meeting (better published material)

It seems to be more strict now. However, you are good enough. You have met most of the criteria.
Good luck!

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：A little additional information(Peasewang did good job!) -LRS-08- ♂ (19 bytes) () 03/22/2008 postreply 12:34:43