I agree with you that "GC is based on future employment" - 回複:Yo

來源: pjiang 2008-03-20 07:11:41 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (493 bytes)
I agree with you that "GC is based on future employment". But in practice, one is not currently employed, with respect to underlying I-140 petition, at the time of adjudication, will usually not have his adjust application approved.

Generally, an EB-1b does not need an interview. One of triggers is that EB-1 changed his employer, as in I-485 SOP. Giving the situation, I could not think of a better suggestion than what XBT suggested, to put EB-1b in a SAFE position.


所有跟帖: 

回複:I agree with you that "GC is based on future employment" - 回複 -greencard1998- 給 greencard1998 發送悄悄話 (115 bytes) () 03/20/2008 postreply 10:32:27

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”