(ZT)國務院的最新解釋

那個律師又跟國務院聯係了以下，這是他的最新說法。
總之，國務院搞了半天，有兜回到原先的說法上。即因為A3人太多，所以都給了他們。
就是按PD來。如果以後都是這樣，咱們中國人永無出頭之日了，因為A3實在太多，就是
全世界14萬全部給他們，也不夠。

This is the post from Ron:

I have to confess error and make a correction. The AC21 legislation changed
things far more that I suspected and changed the allocation process from
what I had learned previously. In further corresondence with the Visa Office
, I've learned that I was wrong about how numbers are moved from worldwide
to single state allocations. The following is a direct quote:


Quote:
Employment First Preference example: Annual limit 40,000 - (expected) 25,000
("rest of world") - 3,300 (China limit) - 3,300 (India limit) = 8,400
unused numbers. Those 8,400 numbers could be made available to China/India
applicants without regard to their normal 3,300 per-country limit for that
category. But those extra numbers would need to be made available to China/
India applicants on an equal basis, and in doing so making sure that the
additional number use would not result in the Worldwide annual limit being
exceeded. Thus, the same cut-off date for each country since the extra
numbers must be made available in priority date order without regard to
country.

I apologize for the confusion generated by my earlier remarks

所有跟帖： 

• 剛剛又捐了$100給LIA。謝謝組織LIA的同學們付出的努力。 -悄悄話提醒- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 16:21:38

• 回複：(ZT)國務院的最新解釋 -balsam_pear_k- ♂ (138 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 17:01:42

• 裝嘲賣傻， 騙小孩！一貫幾兩。 -nzh- ♂ (190 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 19:51:24

• 回複：(ZT)國務院的最新解釋 -blueswan- ♀ (34 bytes) () 03/18/2008 postreply 21:44:18