Calm down first

Do not be over-reacted. I do not think that uscis did the way like we thought here. Just suggest to do action before consulting some experts, like lawyer.
If you do not my word, just ignor.

所有跟帖： 

• As a matter of fact, this was the first question -6873- ♂ (95 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:32:10

• to be fair, India EB2 was stuck at Jan 03 for a long time if you -fkmmm- ♀ (84 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:43:44

• check March 08 VB section D -小老鼠上燈台- ♀ (741 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:53:04

• 那是因為印度申請人實在太多，不是有什麽問題 -madox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:54:00

• there are also many Chinese applicants -小老鼠上燈台- ♀ (239 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:56:26

• 即使有什麽問題，難道你說因為別人曾被treated unfairly at Jan 03 for a long time if -madox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:55:17

• 那老中就得忍受被treated unfairly？ -madox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:55:56

• 就是因為這種想法，老中已經吃了太多的虧! -madox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:57:01

• Question is how you know the reason is from unfair by uscis?? -gugugu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 12:16:23

• yes, be thoughtful. @@ 回複：Calm down first -gugugu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:45:24

• XIAOBAITU and PIJIANG, what is your opinion? -gugugu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 11:51:31

• If situation reversed, how will people from other country react -swingtrading- ♂ (81 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 13:19:50

• "do action before consulting some experts, like lawyer."??? -fcckuscis- ♂ (107 bytes) () 03/14/2008 postreply 13:51:41